FATHERS AND SONS by Ivan Turgenev

Fathers feel that they now belong to bygone times and sons feel that they have learned enough to indoctrinate new scientific theories and philosophies to the fathers. This happens today and this happened in this realistic classical work, based on the Russian society of the mid 19th century.

The story begins with two brothers. First one, Nikolai Petrovitch, who had lost his wife, but there remained a sense of well-spent life, as his son was growing up under his eyes and, second Pavel Petrovitch, on the contrary, was a solitary bachelor, who was entering upon a certain kind of indefinite twilight period of regrets that are akin to hopes, and hopes that are akin to regrets, when youth is over, while old age has not yet come.

On one fine day of May 1859, Nikolai receives his son Arkady, who has just finished his graduation from the University of Petersberg.

“So here you are, a graduate at last, and come home again,” said Nikolai Petrovitch, touching Arkady now on the shoulder, now on the knee. ‘At last!’.

Fathers and sons

Here comes the most interesting character of this novel Mr. Bazarov, who is a friend of Arkady and has returned with him. He stays at the estate of Arkady’s father for some time before going to his own family place.

Bazarov a very clever and intelligent young man who has a strong sense of conviction and aggression about his thoughts and words. He scorns art, family life, and women. He is representative of the theory of Nihilism. I did not know if this concept of nihilism was already popular at that time in Russia or was made popular by Turgenev through this book. Then I learned that the epithet of nihilism was in use since 1829 and this book only extended its interpretation.

Bazarov does not believe in anything. He only believes in himself. He is cynical about his love affairs and he does not at all care about paternal tenderness. One day he sees the father of Arkady reading Pushkin and he says to Arkady…

‘The day before yesterday I saw him reading Pushkin’, Bazarov was continuing meanwhile.‘Explain to him, please, that that is no earthly use. He is not a boy you know; it’s time to throw up that rubbish. And what an idea to be romantic at this time of day! Give him something sensible to read.’

‘What ought I to give him ?’Asked Arkady.

‘Oh, I think Buchner’s Stoff and raft to begin with.’

Fathers and sons

Bazarov is full of scientific theories and he has plans for the mankind and for lower classes but Pavel Petrovitch, an uncle of Arkady, slowly inculcates the vehement feeling of contempt to Bazarov, because of his nihilist ideology, which somewhere in the middle of the story, takes the form of a very unnecessary and egoistic clash in the form of a duel between them. This classic story moves ahead in style and covers multiple themes and contexts.

I came to know that Turgenev was an enthusiastic hunter and it was his experience in the woods of his native province that supplied material for ‘A Sportsman’s Sketches’, the book that had first brought him a reputation. I have not read it yet, however, I witnessed a different sort of hunting abilities of the author in this book. He has hunted the prevailing belief and order through his character of Bazarov, whom he has made so strong that all existing philosophies die away in front of him. You may not like him for his rudeness and crudity but you would certainly get impressed by his astonishing brilliance.

I got a wonderful picture of Russian society, of its aristocracy, of its middle class and of its peasantry life. The content of this book is very rich in its prose and style. I read two different translations of this work. I enjoyed both. I found nothing unnecessary in the plot, one thing complemented the other. Conversation among the characters is extremely lively and at those places, I was nearly absorbed with the characters and ambiance. Though he has not created any dominated woman character here, the fancy towards young girls is well depicted. Conflict of personality in male characters and struggle against ‘the clutches of circumstances’ among female characters can be felt at many places.

As a reader, I can not be more satisfied when I find the characters of a book so real and engrossing that they go directly into me and get embedded somewhere within me with their own viewpoints and tenets. I would very much like to read more of this great writer, I have already enlisted some of his major works.

19th Century 20th Century Adventure Africa American Asia Booker British Literature Children Classic contemporary Crime Detective Drama Essays fantasy French Literature German Literature Gothic Historical Fiction Horror Humor India Indian Literature magical realism Memoir Music Mystery Nature Netgalley Nobel Prize Non Fiction Novel Novella Philosophy Play Poetry Race Romance Russia Russian Literature School Short Stories War Women

A Doll’s House: Ibsen’s masterpiece

“Look into any man’s heart you please and you will always find, in everyone at least one black spot which he has to keep concealed.”

Henrik Ibsen

Let me snatch my tambourine out of the box and let me hurriedly drape myself in my Kashmiri pashmina shawl. I do not have a parti-colored shawl like Nora. You sit at the piano like Helmer and play the first bars of the tarantella. But I will not dance violently like Nora. She was panicked. She was afraid of the consequences. She was too much fearful for the revelation of a letter. The secret she had kept for long. I am not afraid of anything. I am grateful. So I’ll not dance a violent tarantella rather I will go for a soft ballet.

I was reading Ibsen first time in my life and the first time while reading a book I found a desire in me to dance. The genre of literature is made for the performers, yet sometimes a reader could also find him feeling like performing by merely reading a play. This happened to me with this book. This entire play was a five-star reading experience for me from the beginning till the last few pages. It was plain sailing yet very captivating.

Alas! The last five pages forced me to drop one star. It could not happen favorable to this reader. The first two acts had filled me high in expectation. But that was my fault. A reader’s gratuitous conjecture on the plot that just fell flat! Still, it was no short of those five-star reading experiences. So though last night when I finished it I dropped 4 stars on top, yet I am editing to make it five today when I am posting this review. An author does not really care about the conjectures of his readers, so I should also not be vexed upon the turn a book takes at the end. It’s the privilege of the creator. I am familiar with Anton Chekhov’s realism in his stories and plays and have always appreciated him. Similar feel this play gave me at the end. It turned realistic and despondent. But a reader must not be downcast.

A Doll’s House begins on Christmas Eve. Nora Helmer is the main character. Torvald Helmer is Nora’s husband and seems busy and to the point guy. He scolds her for spending so much money on Christmas gifts. Initially, I thought it was a usual rebuke, but later as the play progresses only then I found that money was going to play a big role in their life. Helmer’s friend Dr. Rank has come to visit. At the same time, Kristine Linde, a former school buddy of Nora, comes into the room. They are meeting after a long time and they talk about their good and bad fortunes. Nora keeps repeating to herself and to her friend how she managed to keep her family happy.

“Oh what a wonderful it is to live and be happy.”

A doll’s house

She speaks about how Torvald became sick and the couple had to travel to Italy so that Torvald could recover in health. Nora illegally borrowed money for the trip that she and Torvald took to Italy; she told a lie about the source of the money to her husband. Krogstad, a low-level employee at the same bank where Torvald works, is an important character in the play.

Leave aside the discussion of patriarchy (That is probably the most prominent theme of this play). A girl is a Doll, First, the Papa’s Doll, and then she comes to her husband and becomes husband’s Doll. I was more excited by the free-flowing and effortless conversation among the characters. they were very rhythmic and graceful. Not a single sentence I found uninteresting or out-of-context.

“Yes! don’t you know Nora darling! when we are among strangers do you know why I speak so little to you and keep so far away and only steal a glance at you now and then- do you know why I do it? because I am fancying that we love each other in secret, that I am secretly betrothed to you, and that no one dreams that there is anything between us.”

A Doll’s House

From the first paragraph of this review, You can guess that I was more electrified and exuberant than anything else after reading this book. I found passion in Nora for her case and she delivered her case extraordinarily well. She transfused her passion into the reader. She is smart and confident and was flaunting in the beginning. very attractive and tricky to save her face in the middle. she dances well at the ball and pretends even better. She is an example of a case study of survival-ism till the most part of the book.

The style of the author looked very pure to me. He was a poet. And those poetic blandishments were present in this book. The progression in the play is as flat as pancake. It’s unwrinkled and the dose of emotions in dialogues is heavy. The vehemence of the reactions both in keeping the secret intact and after the revelation of the secret is utterly perceivable. This is the case not only for Nora but for all other major and minor characters. A reassuring beginning for me with Ibsen!